Administration and
|
||||
|
|
||||
Michael Crawford
|
Robert McLeod, Chairman
|
David Howelman
|
||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Minutes |
||||
|
|
||||
Members Present:
|
Bob McLeod, Mike Crawford and David Howelman
|
|||
Members Absent:
|
None
|
|||
Others Present:
|
Pete Garwood and Bob Straw |
|||
|
|
|
|||
1. Meeting called to order at
|
||||
|
2. ACT Grievance |
||||
|
|
Committee
reviewed the notice of disciplinary action (dismissal) given to Lorne Marshall
as well as information about past reprimands and a copy of the work rules
complete with the steps for progressive discipline.
|
|||
|
|
Committee
moved to Room 203-B to accommodate the number of people. |
|||
|
|
Peter
Garwood, Coordinator/Planner informed Mr. Lorne Marshall that he had the
right to request the meeting go into closed session. Mr. Marshall declined and indicated a
preference for open session.
|
|||
|
|
Union
members: Bob Donick, Union Representative; Lorne
Marshall, Grievant and Bob Daniels, Union Steward were present at the meeting.
|
|||
|
|
Mr.
Bob Donick explained the union’s position is that
this situation does not warrant dismissal.
|
|||
|
|
Mr.
Bob McLeod pointed out, and Mr. Donick
acknowledged, the work rules indicate dismissal as the standard step for a
third Class II infraction.
|
|||
|
|
Bob Donick, Bob Daniels and Lorne Marshall explained what
happened regarding the
|
|||
|
|
Mr.
Bob Straw, Antrim County Transportation (ACT) Director reviewed with the Committee
various pictures of the driveway, the post Mr. Marshall ran into, and the
road in relation to the driveway and house.
Mr. Straw explained the reason he made the decision to terminate Mr.
Marshall’s employment with ACT.
|
|||
|
|
Mr.
Marshall and Mr. Daniels presented letters they had collected from riders
indicating their support for Mr. Marshall as a bus driver for ACT. |
|||
|
|
Mr. Donick proposed that Mr. Marshall be reinstated with no
request for lost pay from January 24 to the date of reinstatement. He also proposed a letter of understanding
indicating that if Mr. Marshall has another related infraction, he could be
immediately dismissed.
|
|||
|
|
Mr.
Marshall, Mr. Donick and Mr. Daniels left the room
while the committee reviewed the additional information and discussed the
situation. The Committee discussed
whether the termination was warranted. |
|
|
The committee
agreed that in accordance with the work rules, Mr. Straw acted appropriately
in dismissing Mr. Marshall. However,
the Committee felt that Mr. Marshall made the proper decision by entering the
customer’s driveway (a cancer patient).
The Committee also felt the snowy conditions could have contributed to
the accidental collision with the post on the edge of the driveway. |
|
|
The
Union representatives and Mr. Marshall rejoined the meeting. Committee Chair, Mr. McLeod expressed the
consensus of the Committee as follows: |
|
|
The
termination is withdrawn and changed to a suspension the duration of which
will equal the lost time between January 24th
until February 18th.
Additionally, the |
|
|
Mr. Donick stated the arrangement is agreeable to the union. |
|
|
Meeting
adjourned at |