| BreadCrumb Trail: Main Menu > Taxpayer-supported > Question 188 |
Village of Elk Rapids Planning Commission
Opinion Survey 2005 - Data Compilation
|
| Section 10: Taxpayer-supported Incentives for Development |
| SubSection: (None) |
|
| Question 188 |
Should the following taxpayer-supported incentives/inducements be offered: |
| |
New sidewalks and/or improved sidewalks where they already exist ? |
|
| |
No. of survery forms returned: |
500 |
No. of responses to this question: |
479 |
|
|
| |
Response Scale |
Count |
Percentage |
| 1. | Strong effort | 109 | 22.8 % | | 2. | Moderate effort | 171 | 35.7 % | | 3. | Undecided or no opinion | 55 | 11.5 % | | 4. | Some effort | 79 | 16.5 % | | 5. | No effort | 65 | 13.6 % |
|
|
|
| |
Respondents' Comments to Question 188 |
| 1. | More on east side | | 2. | Property owner pays! | | 3. | Only if needed | | 4. | Village and property owner mandate | | 5. | Village should pay, not the people --- it is general upkeep |
|
| |
