| BreadCrumb Trail: Main Menu > Taxpayer-supported > Question 187 |
Village of Elk Rapids Planning Commission
Opinion Survey 2005 - Data Compilation
|
| Section 10: Taxpayer-supported Incentives for Development |
| SubSection: (None) |
|
| Question 187 |
Should the following taxpayer-supported incentives/inducements be offered: |
| |
New roads in subdivisions or developments ? |
|
| |
No. of survery forms returned: |
500 |
No. of responses to this question: |
479 |
|
|
| |
Response Scale |
Count |
Percentage |
| 1. | Strong effort | 39 | 8.1 % | | 2. | Moderate effort | 97 | 20.3 % | | 3. | Undecided or no opinion | 100 | 20.9 % | | 4. | Some effort | 94 | 19.6 % | | 5. | No effort | 149 | 31.1 % |
|
|
|
| |
Respondents' Comments to Question 187 |
| 1. | Developers pay | | 2. | Require developer to do this | | 3. | Developer pays! | | 4. | The subdivisions should make own roads | | 5. | Paid by developer | | 6. | Make developers pay for all infrastructure costs. |
|
| |
